Social Geography discussing public spaces as places where everyone is welcome and is free to express their identity.

Introduction\n\n national spaces be defined as places where there is inclusion, open mindedness, equality, and acceptance, no matter where an individual stands in the rank of society (Iveson 2003; Iveson 2007; Nolan 2003) moreover public spaces argon oftentimes non always what they should be and this is because dominant groups, politics, culture, and forcefulness dictates who is in and bring out of place and the enamor uses of these spaces (Valentine 2007) This highly critical and political view of public spaces factor that identities argon constantly ever-changing to adapt to diametric spaces and different contexts, theyre never stock-still (Valentine 2007). This essay will look how public spaces atomic number 18 not always places where everyone is welcome and are put down to evidence their identicalness through the key points of individualism constructed through norms of belong, power and billet determining inclusion/ elision in public spaces and go of politics on belonging in public spaces.\n\n individuality element Constructed Through Norms of Belonging\n\n identity element in public spaces as addressed above, are mentally ill and ever changing in different spatial contexts (Valentine 2007). integrity of the reasons for this is because different public spaces are governed by different norms that bind what is acceptable and what is not (Nolan 2003). It eject be suggested then that, in many public spaces individuals bind to the socially accepted norms, and forefathert freely express their identity. For example young women aid night clubs detailed how you must dress up and vex to certain feminine stereotypes (showing cleavage) to straighten out entry from bouncers (Waitt, Jessop, & Gorman-Murray 2011). For the girls studied in this article, norms about clubs/pubs spaces dictated their identities when they went out and dressed up, therefrom they were conforming to the objective phallic gazes and not freely expressing identity (Wait t, Jessop, & Gorman-Murray 2011).\n\nPower and Status ascertain Inclusion/Exclusion in Public Spaces\n\nPublic spaces are not always a place where everyone is welcome and free to express their identity, and this is partially overdue to social powers and their locations at bottom our society. The locations of power concerns the way groups and individuals are viewed within society (Iveson 2007, Dunn 2001). Many groups are excluded, not tolerated, frowned upon and feared, simply because they do not fit the unoriginal use of space resolute by a public majority (Iveson 2007, Nolan 2003, Dunn 2001). As discussed by Iveson (2007) public spaces are fit more neo-liberalised as a result of globalisation and capitalistic underpinnings. These...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!